Development roadmap

Progress through evidence, review, and controlled implementation.

Development proposalThe architecture, applications, and token model describe planned research. Production deployment, security audits, and token issuance have not been verified for this publication.

Milestones, not price targets

The stages below are proposed gates. They do not claim completed work, committed launch dates, future revenue, or token appreciation.

01 / Specification

Define the system

Document users, task types, threat models, data rights, service terms, and whether a token is necessary.

Exit criterion

Publish a reviewable specification and measurable acceptance criteria.

02 / Prototype

Test the complete workflow

Build one controlled off-chain AI workflow connected to test-network contracts. Test rejection, cancellation, and refund paths.

Exit criterion

Release reproducible results, code review findings, and known limitations.

03 / Supervised pilots

Validate practical use

Trial selected applications with consenting participants. Measure quality, cost, latency, privacy, and incident handling.

Exit criterion

Meet disclosed service thresholds and resolve material security findings.

04 / Release review

Decide whether to launch

Review operations, independent security assessment, legal requirements, and any proposed token economics.

Exit criterion

Publish final parameters and verified addresses before any production launch.

Measure the system that users experience

AI service quality

Task success, false acceptance, reproducibility, uncertainty, and the frequency of required human review.

Operational performance

Completion rate, p50/p95 latency, cost per accepted task, dispute resolution, and incident recovery.

Network resilience

Provider concentration, failure recovery, contract invariants, administrative controls, and critical dependencies.

Security and governance are release work

Document upgrade powers, treasury permissions, review responsibilities, and emergency procedures. Independent assessment adds evidence; it is not a guarantee that a system is risk-free.

Build with AIC

Discuss AI research, blockchain engineering, a supervised pilot, or a technical collaboration. Describe your use case and the evidence needed to evaluate it.

A team working together around a table